Teams meeting part 1

顯示更多

發佈者 RigaFist

Video Transcription

--get rid of configure because the slogan weird.

And so I've chatted with Kenny about it,

and Kenny has been of the opinion

that, yes, we should keep those.

And so my thought is, as long as we make the page clear,

顯示更少 顯示更多

that we don't do what, I don't know, Chef does.

So if it's a set of 10 to 15 capabilities,

there's probably seven of them that we don't have.

We just don't do that.

And so in the little visual graphic,

it's clear Chef does--

their point on this part is really high,

and our point is low.

But we do do some infrastructure configuration stuff,

and we should have that listed.

That's my thought on it, is, yes, we have it,

but we just make it clear.

And in the description, it should be clear, Chef does this.

GitLab doesn't do that.

GitLab does this.

People use GitLab with Chef.

If you've got Kubernetes, you probably don't need Chef.

Does that sound right?

It does.

And maybe we can chat on our one-on-one,

talk a bit more about this, because I

think there is some level of overlap

between what we capture as features in CD and Configure.

So we might want to be very clear about where

we want to put the features.

Excuse me.

OK, let's follow up one-to-one.

I'll just say quickly on 7 that Harsh will schedule a call

with this team.

...

  • 1,707
  • 08:20
類別