Netflix and chill?😏

like she admits she did not read that last question.

And that's really the point, that she just

did not read that last question.

Now let's listen to just a little bit more

of what the cop had to say.

-Objections to the relevance, as far as it being--

-Objections to the relevance, as far as it being a certain

-Again, under the case law, there's

no requirements for this question line.

-So basically what he's showing now, I think,

is that all of that is on the thing

that Sarah Boone signed the bottom of,

the waiver and consent form.

Which, to me, he's trying to say, look, it's right there.

You didn't see it through the tasking cop.

But the judge, again, now looking

at the totality of the circumstances,

Sarah Boone has been read these rights not once,

but twice in two days.

And she signed a form that had them written out the bottom.

And that form had the questions.

To me, this is more of a reference to the state.

The state didn't use that in their argument at the end.

I would have thrown that in there,

...